![]() The migrations of the Cimbri tribe through Gaul and adjacent territories had disturbed the balance of power and incited or provoked other tribes, such as the Helvetii, into conflict with the Romans. In numbers of losses, this battle is regarded as the worst defeat in the history of ancient Rome. Roman losses are described as being up to 80,000 troops, as well as another 40,000 auxiliary troops (allies) and servants and camp followers - virtually all of their participants in the battle. The terrible defeat gave Gaius Marius the opportunity to come to the fore and radically reform the organization and recruitment of Roman legions. However, bitter differences between the commanders prevented the Roman armies from cooperating, with devastating results. Ranged against the migratory tribes of the Cimbri under Boiorix and the Teutoni were two Roman armies, commanded by the proconsul Quintus Servilius Caepio and consul Gnaeus Mallius Maximus. The Battle of Arausio took place on 6 October 105 BC, at a site between the town of Arausio (modern day Orange, Vaucluse) and the Rhône River. There have also been articles in such diverse areas of study as Research Methodology in Classics and Byzantine / Medieval Studies.Text #9610 "Battle of Arausio", in Wikipedia. Some interesting work has also been done in the history of Classical Scholarship - including the work of South African Classics scholars - Lexicography, Epigraphy, Art, and Archaeology. Further contributions have been made in the field of Ancient Philosophy and Ancient Religion. Many contributions have been made in the field of Ancient History, but the majority have been literary in nature. The journal publishes work in all fields of Classics, from textual criticism to the Classical Tradition / Reception Studies. It has published work by scholars residing in South Africa, the United States of America, the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Canada, Australia, Germany, The Netherlands, Rhodesia and Nyasaland / Zimbabwe / Tanzania, Belgium, New Zealand, Italy, Israel, Poland, Greece, France, and Japan. ![]() The language of publication is mainly English, but many contributions have also been written in Afrikaans, German, French, Dutch, Latin, and Italian.Īcta Classica is an international journal. Articles from volume 57 (2014) have DOI tags (DOI 10.15731/AClass).Īcta Classica publishes articles, notes, and reviews. The intention here is to retrieve some idea of the extent of the campaigning of both sides in the war and the magnitude of the disaster as it affected the region south of the Pyrenees.Īcta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa (ISSN 0065-1141) appears annually and is listed on the ISI and SAPSE list of accredited journals. The ancient sources have obscured the enormity of the threat and its consequences, especially for Iberia. The Cimbri and Teutones posed the greatest challenge to Rome's supremacy, even its existence, since the invasion of Italy by Hannibal. Gaius Marius may have engineered the Roman defence and finally great victories on the battlefield, but this triumph has obscured a regional catastrophe the likes of which were not to be seen again until the final days of the Roman Empire in the West. However, the conflict had a much wider and more devastating impact. The wars themselves are remembered chiefly for battles fought in southern Gaul and northern Italy between 105 and 101. The Cimbric Wars and their impact on the Iberian peninsula comprise an episode in Roman history, which has been neglected by both ancient and modern commentators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |